Mark Blaxill Remains Connected To BCG – A Pharma-Tied Consulting Firm

boston_consulting_group

By Jake Crosby

Revelations about Mark Blaxill’s ties to his former employer the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and its pharmaceutical clients – in contradiction to what he said in a recently recorded interview on Linderman Unleashed – have now come to the attention of Autism Investigated. These discoveries were made on the heels of even more troubling evidence coming to light: see the previous post about Mark Blaxill turning the lead omnibus attorneys against expert witnesses Dr. Mark and David Geier with baseless and profane attacks against them.

In spite of Mark Blaxill claiming on Linderman Unleashed that he was fired from the BCG – suggesting his autism advocacy played a role – he appears to have voluntarily left the firm for the purpose of starting his own company and for reasons wholly unrelated to autism. In fact, Blaxill still maintains ties to BCG despite no longer being employed with the firm as Senior Vice President and despite claiming he no longer has a conflict of interest “of any kind.” Blaxill also falsely claimed to have always consulted for non-pharmaceutical clients while a BCG executive, merely admitting the firm had pharmaceutical clients but he in fact concealed from Linderman’s audience that he had consulted for Merck during his BCG employment.

Here’s the story he gave on his podcast interview with Curt Linderman, dated October 24, 2013, regarding his BCG departure:

“And then in 2006 – early in 2006 not very long after Evidence of Harm came out – all of a sudden I found myself without a job, and I was no longer at the Boston Consulting Group…I did have issues that concerned me, and it actually didn’t stop me from speaking out, Curt, but it did worry me a little, and who knows? Maybe my worries were founded because I’m not working there anymore, and that was not my choice.”

However, the book Lords of Strategy: The Secret Intellectual History of the New Corporate World by Walter Kiechel tells a story about Mark Blaxill’s departure from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) that totally contradicts what Blaxill told Linderman. According to Kiechel:

“Blaxill wanted to push on to the issue of motivation, of why people worked on Linux for free, even into issues of creativity, but couldn’t find the time or support within the firm for exploring those dimensions. “The antibodies resisted that,” he says. In 2006, Blaxill left BCG to set up his own firm, 3LP Advisors, to concentrate on the intersection of strategy, intellectual property, and innovation.”  

In his interview on Linderman, Blaxill said 3LP Advisors was founded as a result of his firing from Boston Consulting Group, claiming the termination of his employment “was not my choice.” Yet not only was it his choice according to Kiechel, but in fact Blaxill left Boston Consulting Group so that he could found 3LP Advisors to practice his own business strategy the way he liked – nothing to do with autism.

Linderman then further questioned Blaxill specifically about his conflict of interest with Boston Consulting Group since 2006:

“To me it would seem as if you were still with this company and you still had this conflict of interest, and that is not the case since 2006?”

To which Blaxill replied by emphatically denying possession of any conflict of interest:

“Curt, I don’t have a conflict of interest of any kind now, and I have not had one for years. I haven’t had a conflict since I started the Age of Autism with JB Handley and Dan Olmsted and Kim Stagliano back in 2007. I haven’t had a conflict since I wrote the book The Age of Autism. I haven’t had a conflict since starting the Canary Party. The only time I had a conflict was when I was helping David Kirby and contributing to the Evidence of Harm book. And it’s even in the book, Curt; I have never hid the conflict. I’ve actually been public with people and open with people about the concerns I’ve had. So it’s not as though there is any great secrets I was keeping. And whatever concern I had, it is not operative any longer.”

However, Blaxill remains a board member of the Initiative for a Competitive Inner City (ICIC), which has received over $25,000 annually from Boston Consulting Group. Serving on the board with him is none other than Boston Consulting Group’s Chairman of the Board Carl Stern.

ICIC’s chairman and founder as well as Harvard Business School Prof. Michael Porter was thanked in no uncertain terms in the acknowledgements section of the book Blaxill coauthored in 2009 with his business partner Ralph Eckardt, “The Invisible Edge: Taking Your Strategy to the Next Level Using Intellectual Property:

“[The Boston Consulting Group Founder’s] ideas have been extended and enriched by the academic and consulting community in Boston, most notably by Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter, on one hand, and our former colleagues at BCG on another.”

Blaxill and Eckardt then summed up their relationship with Prof. Porter as follows:

“Michael Porter has been a teacher, a collaborator, a client, and a friend.” 

It seems Blaxill and Eckardt are not the only ones with high praise for Prof. Porter. When Porter was awarded a prestigious University Professorship at Harvard, Merck’s then-chairman, president and CEO Raymond Gilmartin (who later resigned over the Vioxx scandal and became a Harvard Business School Professor himself) told the Harvard Gazette:

“Through his research, teaching, and writing, Mike Porter has made an indelible mark on businesses and markets everywhere. His leading-edge research has directly influenced the strategies and competitiveness of individual firms and the nation. More recently, he has helped to identify the key drivers of innovation, which has now become the basis of global competition. His insights are directly relevant to understanding the vital ingredients for success in a host of industries, including pharmaceuticals.”

Clearly Blaxill has much to gain by serving on ICIC’s board of directors with his former employer BCG’s Chairman of the Board while under Prof. Porter’s chairmanship. ICIC’s website boasts that the organization’s partners “gain as well as give.” It’s hard to fathom how Blaxill could honestly claim on Linderman to not possess a conflict of interest “of any kind.”

But Blaxill was not even honest in the Linderman interview about what he did during his past employment for BCG. He claimed:

“…I always worked with industrial companies, automotive, forest products, computers-type companies, but they also had pharmaceutical clients.”

But he did not solely work with those companies, because Blaxill consulted for Merck directly as a BCG employee himself. In 2010, he told me he had visited Merck’s headquarters in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. Later at a 2011 gathering in Waltham, Massachusetts, where Blaxill announced his preliminary plans to found the Canary Party – I overheard him telling someone about his experience consulting for Merck, describing his former clients as “not that smart.”

Despite suggesting his departure from Boston Consulting Group was some sort of martyrdom for his autism advocacy and that he no longer has any ties to the firm, it appears that Mark Blaxill was not fired, but left on his own terms wholly unrelated to autism and even remains connected to his former employer who continues to serve pharmaceutical clients.

Jake Crosby is editor of Autism Investigated and is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. He is a 2011 graduate of Brandeis University with a Bachelor of Arts in both History and Health: Science, Society and Policy and a 2013 graduate of The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services with a Master of Public Health in Epidemiology. He currently attends the University of Texas School of Public Health where he is studying for a Ph.D. in Epidemiology.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

16 Thoughts on “Mark Blaxill Remains Connected To BCG – A Pharma-Tied Consulting Firm

  1. Lujene G. Clark, MA, LMT on January 14, 2014 at 12:04 am said:

    Well done, Jake!! I am SO proud of you!! Keep up the fine investigative work. Thank you for standing up for the truth, the WHOLE truth!! I will take this opportunity to tell everyone in the autism community.. “I TOLD YOU SO!!!” For ten darn years, I told y’all he was working AGAINST our efforts.

  2. White Rose on January 14, 2014 at 1:20 am said:

    Mark Blaxills suspicious behaviour can be seen on YouTube very easily .
    “there may very well be a case for the rubella vacine” he says , and any basic research on that vaccine quickly turns up side effects of chronic arthritis running at 15 % or greater (& i am presuming we are talking about juvenile arthritis here , Lyme disease , of whic there has been an explosion of since 1970)

    Please correct me if I am wrong .

    And he goes on to make ambiguous statements saying the case for or against vaccines is still to decided.
    He is always trying to dilute the message , always trying to muddy the waters .

    Mark , you need to step down . Resign , and forget all about Autism , your efforts are no longer required .

    • It’s a moot point to go and discuss potential benefits of vaccination when that has always been a wholly separate issue from the fact that the CDC concealed its own research showing vaccines cause autism, congressional exposure of which he continues to prevent. If he wanted it exposed, then he wouldn’t keep acting like it was still an open question or prevent the cover-up from being the focus of the congressional hearings. Obviously, those efforts are not only unnecessary, but systematically destructive.

  3. Jake,

    Did you ever see the 2012 film Promised Land? It’s about the fracking industry starring Matt Damon and John Krasinski. I just watched it this weekend. I don’t want to give anything away. But, you should check it out sometime. I think you would like it.

    Good work uncovering these facts. Nothing surprises me anymore.

  4. White Rose on January 15, 2014 at 7:25 am said:

    Is anyone able to list out all the known indiscretions by Mark Blaxill ?

    1. scuppering of the legal omnibus
    2. blocking of Brain Hooker at the hearings
    3. ???
    4. ???

    • 3. Changing the topic of the last hearing
      4. Presiding over the December-scheduled hearing that was cancelled because of the hearing topic his organization spearheaded
      5. Undermining SafeMinds’ response to the Lilly protection rider
      6. Holding the briefing that misrepresented Hannah Poling’s case
      7. Allowing commenters to attack her mother for wanting her daughter’s records private
      8. Persistently trying to keep the CDC fraud from being exposed in the hearings
      9. Telling David Kirby to say “evidence” instead of “proof” thimerosal causes autism
      10. Acting like a lead proponent of the thimerosal-autism link only to backtrack on his position later
      11. Consistently having mention of vaccines replaced with “environmental” in advocacy efforts
      12. Pretending he is no longer tied to BCG when he still is
      13. Pretending he did not directly consult for pharma companies while at BCG when he has
      14. Trying to discredit me behind my back by making discriminatory statements about my autism

      There’s more, but you get the idea…

  5. Letthembegot on January 15, 2014 at 5:02 pm said:

    I Just read an open letter from Victoria Beck to the IACC – what struck me was that she is so crystal clear about the cause of her sons regressive autism. As we all know – Vaccine induced.
    She is uncompromising about her commitment to treat and help her son.
    But what also jumped out was her fear of a vaccine mandate that would further injure her son. There is not a hint of a waver towards possibly some vaccines, or space them out. She knows it was vaccines and she is boycotting them as are so many parents of vaccine injured children.

    Why is Mark Blaxill sitting on the fence over some vaccines ? this community is not sitting on the fence we are talking about a complete boycott and I am waiting for prosecutions for those who are culpable.

    From VIctoria Becks open letter:

    I live in such fear. EACH. AND. EVERY. DAY. Fear of what new vaccine will be forced upon him. Fear that if I don’t comply, I will lose the precious few services I do get, or worse yet, lose custody of my son in someone else determining they know what is best for him better than me, HIS MOTHER, and my GOD-GIVEN MOTHER’S INSTINCT. Fear of what happens to him once I die.

    My presence here is very much me overturning the tables in the temple where the money changers of Pharma, Vaccine Manufacturers, Monsanto and GMO’s have desecrated my child’s health for nothing more than profit. To me, they are a den of robbers who must be liable for the damages the toxins in their products have inflicted upon my son. The CDC and NIH must be held accountable for their inaction.

    I guess one thing has changed since the last time I was here. The status quo is no longer good enough. Parents like me are many and we no longer believe the lies told to us in what does or does not cause autism. We know the truth and will continue to expose it.

    We will NEVER QUIT.

  6. Doug Troutman on January 16, 2014 at 2:24 am said:

    I first heard MB in Myrtle Beach at an NAA conference and I thought this guy is a good speaker. My wife has good intuition and thought he was fake, When he was on various news stations he always lacked conviction. I just listened to Dr. Hooker on Terri Arranga’s show on Health Voice America and he did a wonderful job summarizing the Thimerosal issue. Through your investigative reporting I now have a clear picture of why the truth has been suppressed. Thanks Jake

  7. WTG JAKE!!!!

    My mama always told me….if it smells like a snake, looks like a snake, its a snake! Great work! Keep it up!

  8. Kathleen on January 24, 2014 at 3:51 am said:

    Bottom line, Jake. When one expects transparency from the corporations we’re are questioning….we must also have the same transparency…..Mark should know this and all the people who are questioning you (uh-hmmm…Ginger) should realize this. You cannot ask for what you do not offer! I am so very proud of your backbone, honesty and tenacity:-)
    How about those newly released FOIA documents? Criminal.

  9. White Rose on January 24, 2014 at 2:16 pm said:

    This individual and cohorts (because he is very unlikely to be the only infiltraitor) needs to be aware of a few facts . That this holocaust is way beyond the seeking of compensation now , this is very much in the realm of criminality , & I for one , will be looking for prosecutions for the crimes against humanity ,
    This crime is of such a magnitude and of such depravity , that he and the other collaborators must know they are fighting for their very lives and reputation .

    Everyone here needs to listen to this recording that Brian Hooker gave 2 weeks ago and see just how proficient this scientist is at presenting the case that vaccines are the sole cause of autism , and how he had to be blocked from talking at Congress Nov2012 at all costs .

    http://www.voiceamerica.com/episode/75232/autism-and-vaccines-the-cover-up

    AoA representatives need to respond to all these allegations or is everyone at AoA compromised ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Post Navigation