Autism Investigated Renews Call to Extradite Poul Thorsen to the US

Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services

A study was just published in the Annals of Internal Medicine by some of Danish fugitive Poul Thorsen’s former research fraud co-conspirators. Autism Investigated is re-running this post from 2017 to renew its call to President Trump to extradite Thorsen to the United States and stand trial.

Last year, Autism Investigated’s editor publicly spoke out at the annual AutismOne conference in favor of renewed efforts to push for extradition of vaccine-autism link “debunker” Poul Thorsen. This year, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is leading the push to do just that:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and World Mercury Project Issue Report Regarding New Evidence of Ongoing Corruption and Scientific Misconduct at CDC

Kennedy hopes new evidence and a fresh look at criminal misconduct will result in law enforcement action, rigorous and transparent vaccine safety science, and safer vaccines.

In a new report released September 18, 2017, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his team outlined various criminal acts on the part of employees and consultants for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) whose questionable ethics and scientific fraud have resulted in untrustworthy vaccine safety science.

Among other information, Kennedy has found additional evidence of criminal activity by the CDC consultant, Poul Thorsen, the author and principal coordinator of multiple CDC studies exonerating the mercury-based preservative thimerosal in the development of autism.

The new evidence, recently uncovered World Mercury Project, shows that Thorsen and his collaborators did not obtain permission from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to conduct their research, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002 and Pediatrics in 2003. In 2011, The Department of Justice indicted Thorsen on 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering for stealing over $1 million in CDC grant money earmarked for autism research. The product of Thorsen’s work for CDC was a series of fraud-tainted articles on Danish autism rates that, today, form the backbone of the popular orthodoxy that vaccines don’t cause autism.

In 2009, when CDC discovered that Thorsen never applied for the IRB approvals, staff did not report the errors and retract the studies. Rather, FOIA documents show that CDC supervisors ignored the missteps and covered up the illegal activity.

This misconduct, undermines the legitimacy of these studies, which were used to refute vaccine injury claims in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). The studies were also used in the NVICP’s “Omnibus” to dismiss 5000 petitions by families who claimed that their children had developed autism from vaccines. These claims, if settled in the claimants’ favor, would have resulted in payouts totaling an estimated $10 billion.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, stated, “World Mercury Project calls upon Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, to extradite Thorsen back to the U.S. to face prosecution. We also call upon Secretary of Health and Human Services, Dr. Tom Price, to retract the Thorsen-affiliated autism research papers that are the fruit of illegally conducted research.”

Originally published at World Mercury Project

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Ethan Lindenberger To Tell The Senate How Mother Put Him in an Oven

Reddit

Time to fire your six-figure-salaried PR agents, CDC. Ethan Lindenberger has just found the easily-swayed group your consultants completely missed: teenagers. He’s even going to testify before the Senate on Tuesday.

Ethan Lindenberger is totally not a spiteful teenager. Just ask every mainstream media source. He said so himself, “I’m a very obedient child. I don’t really try to go against my mom. Even though I’m 18, I don’t pull that card.”

He’s a very obedient child! He doesn’t pull that card! He just posts that meme likening his mother’s decision to not get him toxic vaccinations as an infant to her putting him in an oven. No big deal!

Oh, and he called his parents “stupid” in his original Reddit post to internet strangers asking how to get vaccinated. And then there’s the fact that he never even called or emailed the CDC, which was his whole basis for going against his mom in the first place.

It’s too bad the archaic CDC isn’t like Reddit. Dialing your iPhone won’t show the world what an obediant child you are by goading strangers into piling on your public insults of your parents. That oven meme of his mother would never see the light of day either. Do a better job CDC! If there’s one group that hates parents as much as you, it’s teenagers!

Start your own message board for angry teenagers where they can vent their hatred at their parents. What better way to emphasize to these impressionable, Bernie-loving kids that only the government is what really has their best interests at heart?

Meanwhile, Lindenberger will testify to the US Senate how his mother put him in an oven.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Amazon Prime Crashes and Burns Under Federal Censorship Request

Amazon Prime has pulled documentaries that show vaccines are dangerous, including Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe. The decision comes as House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff wrote yet another letter to a major tech company demanding censorship of vaccine dangers for “scientific” purposes. Already, YouTube has de-monetized anti-vaccine videos after its parent companies CEO helped invest $12 million into a less useless flu shot. Facebook has also said it would censor vaccine information, while Pinterest has scrubbed all vaccine-related content.

No wonder vaccines are so unsafe, you’re not supposed to criticize them! Not on Amazon, not on YouTube, not anywhere! Forget about medical journals, they are so far gone. It’s all hardly surprising given that Amazon’s Washington Post is a worthless propaganda rag being sued for hundreds of millions of dollars for defamation.

Rather than censor documentaries for spreading “misinformation,” Amazon should really ensure the accuracy of its own publications before throwing stones. And rather than censor vaccine safety issues, Amazon Prime should also work on safety issues with its own cargo planes. Sadly, that work will come too late for three of its pilots who were just killed in the recent Prime Air crash.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Bolstering Google Boss’ Worthless Flu Shot Venture, YouTube De-Monetizes Anti-Vaccine Videos

Larry Page is CEO of Google’s and YouTube’s parent company, Alphabet

Flu shots are worthless garbage, but Bill Gates and Google co-founder Larry Page don’t want you to know that. That’s why YouTube is de-monetizing videos that go against vaccination.

Because they sank their money into it. Now they’re wasting $12 million to make a “better” flu vaccine. It would cover more strains, but they exaggerate the flu’s severity. They also lie about vaccine injury and are using their platforms to cover it up. Thanks for giving more people excuses not to vaccinate!

Tech billionaires want to control what you see at your child’s expense to get greater returns on their investments. Imagine the profit they could turn and the influence they could gain by hyping such a vaccine. It’s no wonder they fear anti-vaccinationists and vaccine skeptics. We are a threat to their bottom line and a proud one at that.

Poisoning children with vaccines and stealing their medical records to make up lies will be Gates’ legacy, and that of likeminded billionaires. Furthermore, it is far worse than his illegal monopoly. Welcome to the corrupt club of crooked tech billionaires, Larry Page. You are right at home with them.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Vaccine Advocates Deliberately Spread Disease to Pump Toxic Vaccines

Vaccine advocates are responsible for spreading measles to the West. The month before the World Health Organization listed “Vaccine Hesitancy” as one of its top 10 global health threats, the UN passed the Global Compact for Migration. The United States was one of just five countries to vote against the resolution because of its encouragement of illegal immigration across the western hemisphere. It even sought to criminalize anti-migration speech. Illegal immigration has driven measles incidence to record levels in Europe, from where measles spread to the US both in 2015 and this year. The US-Mexico border has also seen the spread of viruses, with seven mumps cases confirmed in an ICE detention center and a Guatemalan child dying of flu in US custody.

Vaccine officials have shown that they will even get rid of some vaccines in order to enable the spread of measles. So it is clear that their assistance to migrants is done so deliberately despite the diseases and social problems they will bring to western countries. The International Red Cross’ European branch blocked Autism Investigated on Twitter after its hypocrisy over pushing vaccines while assisting with illegal immigration into Europe was called out publicly. Not only should America defund NGOs like the Red Cross, but we should also withdraw from the World Health Organization. It is time to put America first.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

SharylAttkisson.com: Jake Crosby on Original Autism-Vaccine Cover-Up

Originally posted on SharylAttkisson.com

Note: Views in this and any other opinion piece that appear on this site do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.sharylattkisson.com and are solely those of the author.

By Jake Crosby, MPH

U.S. public health officials like National Institutes of Health doctor Anthony Fauci deny the vaccine-autism link by repeating disinformation about a seminal autism-vaccine study. That study, published in The Lancet in 1998, examined 12 children treated at London’s Royal Free Hospital Medical School. Most developed adverse symptoms shortly after their routine measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations.

The study marked the beginning of the first major research undertaking of the autism-vaccine link at an academic institution. Because parents were startled by the findings, and—in my opinion— because there were huge financial implications in terms of possible lawsuits against vaccine makers, the study and its lead author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, were targeted in a giant campaign to discredit them. Those pursuing this smear campaign, not surprisingly, have ties to vaccine maker GlaxoSmithKline.

One of those people was the Head of Medicine at Royal Free Hospital from 1999-2011, Dr. Mark Pepys. He wanted to stop Dr. Wakefield’s work but the witch hunt would look too obvious if the accusations came directly from the medical school that forced him out two years prior. So Dr. Pepys would need a journalist who could take credit for those accusations while insulating the medical school from scrutiny by being the journalist’s protected “source.”

To begin the smear, medical records of children in the study were leaked to a Sunday Times journalist named Brian Deer. He received children’s names, family backgrounds and hospital admissions dates. Deer would later boast about having this information in the BMJ. In 2004, he posted a child’s medical note and a table of children’s names and the dates they were admitted to the Royal Free on his website. This was a serious violation of medical privacy rules, laws and practices. According to study co-author Simon Murch, “the Data Protection Act must have been broken.”

Dr. Pepys had strong ties to GlaxoSmithKline even before the merger that created the company, enjoying substantial support from precursor Glaxo Wellcome. Before he accepted the position of Head of Medicine of the Royal Free in 1999, he demanded Dr. Wakefield’s dismissal. Dr. Pepys ultimately took credit for ousting Dr. Wakefield at Royal Free Hospital in 2001, effectively dismantling the first autism-vaccine research unit in an academic institution.

After the 1998 study’s publication, Dr. Wakefield’s co-author Dr. Simon Murch was promoted to Director of the Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology at Royal Free Hospital. Then, in September 2003, Dr. Murch submitted a letter to The Lancet repudiating the notion of any possible link between autism and vaccines. His submission came just two months after Crispin Davis, CEO of Lancet publisher Reed Elsevier, joined the board of directors at GlaxoSmithKline.

With Dr. Murch’s repudiation, the United Kingdom (UK) government’s Legal Aid Board cut off financial aid to help victims in lawsuits against MMR manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline. The GlaxoSmithKline alliance with Pepys-headed Royal Free Hospital and the Davis-published Lancet continued as Deer continued to advance the smear. In his reports, Deer claimed Dr. Wakefield’s study was unethical and that he concealed its funding source. The latter claim was “found proved” by a disciplinary tribunal but ultimately overturned.

Deer also took an unusual step for a journalist: he filed a professional disciplinary complaint against Dr. Wakefield and two of his co-authors including Simon Murch.

A week after the complaint, 10 of the 13 Dr. Wakefield’s co-authors, led by Dr. Murch, issued a fraudulent retraction of the interpretation of the 1998 study. It was a statement of regret over raising an autism-vaccine link possibility that was falsely portrayed as a scientific retraction.

After the fraudulent retraction, vaccine interests falsely misrepresented it as if it was a scientific repudiation of any link between vaccines and autism. That retraction became a basis for rejection of thousands of vaccine autism injury claims in U.S. vaccine court.

Then, the smear machine prompted a medical fitness-to-practice tribunal of Dr. Wakefield. Dr. Wakefield’s medical license was revoked in 2010. The chair of that tribunal, Dr. Surendra Kumar, was a GlaxoSmithKline shareholder. After that decision in 2010, “The Lancet” fully retracted Dr. Wakefield’s study.

Ultimately, in 2012, a High Court overturned the reasons of unethical research and misrepresented participant enrollment that remains stated in The Lancet retraction. Unsurprisingly, “The Lancet” has not reversed its retraction.

So today, health officials across the pond here in the U.S., including Dr. Fauci and his superior, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins, continue to cite the false retraction as if it scientifically proves vaccines do not cause autism. They ignore the factual details on the excuse of “The Lancet” journal’s undeserved reputation.

Jake Crosby has a Master of Public Health degree in epidemiology from George Washington University and is editor of AutismInvestigated.com.

Editor’s Note: Crosby received no response for comment from the relevant authors mentioned in his op-ed.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

America Must Cut All Support to NGOs That Assist Measles Importation

Look at this hypocritical organization feigning surprise that there are 82,000 cases of measles in Europe.

After all, it helped assist with its travel:

Activist NGOs like the International Federation of the Red Cross that assist with illegal immigrant travel into the West should be de-funded by countries that suffer the consequences. Doctors who participate in these activities should have their licenses revoked.

Most of these migrants enter Europe through the east where they can then spread it to visitors that come to the US. Patient Zero in the ongoing Washington/Oregon outbreak was from Eastern Europe.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Meghan McCain’s “The View” Plugs Brian Deer After He Smeared Her Husband’s Dead Journalist

“The guy who started this conspiracy, this lie, his name is Andrew Wakefield, a British surgeon. This is what happened, and the truth of the matter is that he was creating a competing vaccine. He had a patent for his own vaccine, see? So he had a motivation to put this lie out.” – Joy Behar

Sorry Federalist editor Ben Domenech, but your wife and her fellow co-hosts are dumb as mud. One month ago, you and Meghan McCain were mourning the loss of one of your hired journalists who died tragically young at the age of 26. Meanwhile, the “journalist” your wife’s fellow co-host just plugged was spreading lies like this (translated): “‘Anti-vaccine’ journalist dead from no vaccination!”

The tweet has since been deleted and with no apology from Brian Deer. Yet one month later, your wife eggs on her fellow co-host after she repeated Deer’s lie that Dr. Wakefield planned a rival vaccine. While your wife’s at it, how about she repeat “conspiracy theory” to parents whose children’s medical records suddenly found their way into Brian Deer’s Gollum-like hands?

It’s all just a conspiracy theory, right?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Bill Gates’ Washington Post Pushes Medical Record-Stealing “Journalism”

The Washington Post reporter who first gave a US media platform for GlaxoSmithKline’s attacks on the 1998 autism-vaccine research concealed from his readers that the lead scientist disclosed his role in litigation. The reporter also wrote how most of the coauthors retracted the interpretation of the study, while leaving out that they mostly still worked for the same London-based hospital that shut down the work. Even though he knew he had no story, Glenn Frankel still wrote, “Charismatic Doctor at Vortex of Vaccine Dispute” anyway. He did not respond to Autism Investigated, of course. That’s because he was led by monopolist couple Bill and Melinda Gates, while writing favorably of Brian Deer making a parent talk to him by lying about his name.

The fake news was in anticipation of Melinda Gates joining the publisher’s board of directors two months later. She has personally slammed President Trump for speaking the facts on the vaccine-autism link during the 2016 election cycle. Bill Gates also called the 1998 study “absolutely fraudulent” and “a fake paper” based on the stolen medical records GlaxoSmithKline acquired of vaccine-injured kids. Those stolen medical records will be attached to his name for the rest of his life, along with his illegal monopoly. What do you expect from somebody who is advised directly by the rubella vaccine inventor who was secretly indemnified by the British government? Not much.

Expect even less from a “news”paper that hires Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig, who lies about her education. Her coverage of vaccines is determined by her college grudge against the editor for correcting her student newspaper lies.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Richard Horton is Thief-in-Chief of Medical Record-Stealing Journal

“The role of Brian Deer mystifies me. I agree with you that he has had access to many confidential documents, which seems surprising.” –Lancet editor Richard Horton in an email to a mother that he’d also leak to Sunday Times‘ reporter Brian Deer, who illegally acquired the medical records of her children.

In 2004, Lancet editor Richard Horton stated that Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 seminal paper on the vaccine-autism link should have dishonestly omitted disabled children’s adverse vaccine events from publication. He said this as he was colluding with the Royal Free Hospital to fabricate lies about the research by distorting medical records the hospital illegally leaked to opposition researcher Brian Deer. They subsequently got all the coauthors still working at the hospital to fraudulently retract the interpretation. They then had the article fully retracted in 2010 after getting the UK’s General Medical Council to sign on to the stolen medical record-based lies.

Then in 2012, the stolen medical record-based reasons stated for The Lancet‘s full retraction of the seminal autism-vaccine paper were overturned in court. So Autism Investigated demanded its editor and three most recent ombudsmen restore the article. In 2015, current ombudsman Malcolm Molyneux admitted to Autism Investigated that the basis of the retraction was not stated in the retraction. Ironically, he later asserted a “strong case” for retraction in his annual report. Of course it’s obvious he’s lying because his editor Richard Horton is telling him to, having colluded with Sir Mark Pepys who shut down that research and ousted its lead scientist.

In the “Ombudsman’s report for 2015,” current ombudsman of The Lancet Malcolm Molyneux wrote:

A surprising complaint received later in the year proposed that a research study that was published in The Lancet in 1998 and fully retracted in February, 2010, should be reinstated to the literature. My adjudication was that the argument for reinstatement of the paper, based on a case in the UK’s High Court brought by one of the paper’s authors, was not directly prejudicial to the strong case for the paper’s retraction. 

In reality, he admitted that the basis for the retraction could no longer be stated by the journal’s retraction statement:

Dear Mr Crosby,

Thank you for your letter of June 13, 2015, in which you request that the Lancet Editor reinstate the retracted paper Ileal-lymphoid-nodular-hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

In the retraction statement, the editors of The Lancet stated that “several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al are incorrect. In particular….’” The retraction then mentions the enrolment procedure and ethical clearance, but implies that there remain other elements on which the decision was based.

Having considered all of the relevant material, I can see no sufficient reason for reinstatement of the Wakefield paper. I do not believe that COPE’s guidelines have been violated by retraction of the paper in question, or by failure to reinstate it.

I do not believe there is justification for any further debate about this extensively discussed article.

Yours sincerely,

Prof Malcolm Molyneux, Lancet Ombudsman

If there was a “strong case” for retraction, Molyneux would be able to make it. Since there is actually no case, he cannot. The Lancet’s full retraction is as fraudulent as 10 of the 13 coauthors’ previous retraction also forced by Pepys and Horton.

Now the editor of the medical record-stealing medical journal has the gall to come to America in March. Let’s tell that medical record thief to his face that he’s not welcome in our country.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon