Alfie Evans Being Murdered To Deny Vaccine Payout Is False

Alfie Evans, BBC

UPDATE: A previous version of this post accused the Facebook profile primarily spreading the rumor of being a fake profile. Autism Investigated was subsequently contacted by the person behind the profile who confirmed that that was not true. This post has been altered to reflect that fact. Autism Investigated regrets the error and apologizes to the person previously named.

UPDATE II: Autism Investigated has contacted Jackie Fletcher. She confirmed that the compensated child developed the adverse reaction before age two but subsequently died later in life. This article has been rewritten to reflect that fact. Autism Investigated regrets the error and thanks the readers for the new information. Additionally, the article has also been updated to reflect the fact that Alfie Evans has just tragically passed away. May this poor child rest in peace. Deepest condolences to his parents.

The conflict between an English hospital and parents of a terminally ill child named Alfie Evans has captivated anti-vaccinationist and vaccine skeptical communities alike. Posts of outrage adorn such groups, fueling bitter infighting and personal attacks. Origin of the rage is a rumor that the hospital is deliberately killing the child before his second birthday so that his parents could never be eligible for vaccine damage payment. And it was simply untrue.

The parents have yet to even confirm an adverse vaccine reaction in the child. When vaccination causes death, the reaction is often noticed well before.

A good example has been described in BMJ by Jackie Fletcher, founder of JABS and a parent who was compensated by the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit:

During the first week of the new MMR campaign in 1988 an eighteen month old infant was given it, started with severe convulsions and subsequently died during a seizure [later in life]. This child was one of a number of children awarded Government recognition of MMR vaccine-damage through vaccine damage payments following medical assessment of the individual cases.

The child was noticeably damaged by the vaccine, later died because of the vaccine, and then the government compensated for that loss. No such history has surfaced for Alfie Evans.

The hospital did not deliberately murder him to deny his parents vaccine damage compensation. Suggesting so reflects poorly on them too. Who wants to be accused of keeping their child alive for payout? Is that what anti-vaxxers seriously want to imply?

Even though death before age two does make one ineligible, the British government still wouldn’t murder this child for £120,000. They just wouldn’t compensate that much, which already isn’t much.

Regardless, this is a tragic story of a young child whose life was cut way too short.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

32 Thoughts on “Alfie Evans Being Murdered To Deny Vaccine Payout Is False

  1. How dare you’s use the term conspiracy theory. How dare you try and discredit someone. This little boy was vaccine damaged. I will post proof here and then let’s see if you shockingly then call it a conspiracy theory. VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM

  2. The law has changed in the UK. No child under two will receive vaccine damage payout. I suggest you update your article or you will be held to account in no uncertain terms. https://www.facebook.com/casey.danson/posts/10216330721680964?notif_id=1524857139056698&notif_t=story_reshare&ref=notif

  3. YOU ARE WRONG!
    Quite simply any child that dies under the age of two does not meet the entitlement conditions. You are scant on your exception so I do not believe you and I do not believe the government would pay out against their own conditions of entitlement:

    Conditions of entitlement.

    (1)Subject to the provisions of this section, the conditions of entitlement referred to in section 1(1)(b) above are—

    (c)that the disabled person was over the age of two on the date when the claim was made or, if he died before that date, that he died after 9th May 1978 and was over the age of two when he died.

    • Then you also do not believe a compensated parent who runs a group dedicated to getting compensation for vaccine-injured children. [UPDATE: See correction up top.]

      You didn’t answer my question, but the legal language suggests timing as opposed to eligibility.

  4. NOPE I DO NOT BELIEVE ANYBODY THAT SAYS THERE IS COMPENSATION IF A CHILD DIES BEFORE REACHING THE AGE OF TWO. IN FACT I MIGHT EVEN CALL THEM A LIAR! ELIGIBILITY CONDITION NOT MET UNTIL CHILD REACHES THE AGE OF TWO. IF THE CHILD DOES NOT EVER REACH THE AGE OF TWO THE CHILD DOES NOT REACH THE AGE OF ELIGIBILITY. DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR?

      • Becky on April 30, 2018 at 2:19 pm said:

        and I think that is where the floating question mark is. Why the rush on pulling life support, and then not feeding or giving water to Alfie, when pulling life support was not effective in ending his life? If I did not feed my child this would be Murder, once the removal of life support was ineffective, it needed to be revisited by the courts don’t you think to say now what? But the original plan was to overdose him on Fentanyl and another medication and the Judge I believe said no to that, Just remove the Life support. and then, when he survived, they removed the basic necessities of life, for what purpose? His parents were even trying to slip hi water through their kisses and that was banned. The Hospital was ensuring his demise. And coincidentally right before his second birthday.

  5. The article is not accurate. The statutory award is not compensation but it is designed to ease the financial burden placed on the vaccine-damaged person and their family.

    According to Statute if child dies before reaching 2 years of age the parents are not eligible to claim by law. Logically the whole purpose of payment is lost.

  6. /Users/kittybrown/Desktop/31670930_1958945317480926_3710505612329615360_n.jpg

  7. Sorry my photo did not work. It states from Thomas Evans “Yes, he has had 6 and we are aware that this could be a possibility.” Speaking about vaccines. Not sure the date.

  8. The father, himself, admitted there was a vaccine injury.

  9. The correction to the article about eligibility for vaccine damage payout has been changed. Thank you all for pointing this out, regret the error.

    Regardless of your opinion, this is a very tragic story of a young boy whose life was cut way too short. May he rest in peace.

  10. Jeanette on April 30, 2018 at 3:28 am said:

    Wow just wow this is sick of you to try and stand behind this evil autisminvestigated who’s paying you off??the dad has all ready said the baby was fine till he got vaxx but you and big p got other plans… instead of arguing the facts why don’t you guys go back to the drawing board and have some more testing done on these so-called safe vaccinations that are proving to be more deadly than the viruses ever wear themselves

  11. Julie on April 30, 2018 at 1:05 pm said:

    There are a lot of people in similar situations left. You better write an article please explaining why children, damaged by vaccines who die before their second birthday are not entitled to any compensations, provided the pain it causes to the family who is not at fault.

  12. No more comments will be approved for this post.

  13. Pingback: Facebook Uses Recent Tragedy to Censor and Divide Anti-Vaccinationists - Autism Investigated

  14. Pingback: Facebook Uses Recent Tragedy to Censor and Divide Anti-Vaccinationists - NAMELY LIBERTY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation