Autism People: Do Not Honor The Andrew Wakefield Turncoat Doctors

Professor John Walker-Smith receives flowers from one of the children he betrayed, Professor John Walker-Smith Facebook Page

John Walker-Smith is the most senior turncoat author of the 1998 landmark autism-vaccine paper to retract his name from the interpretation that vaccines may cause autism. Yet, there remains a Facebook page in his honor dedicated by parents of the vaccine-injured children he betrayed. It stands at 1,301 likes strong. It should fold immediately.

The page was set up to support John Walker-Smith against disciplinary findings against him and two coauthors. However, the entire event was a show trial that deliberately targeted the doctors for scrutinizing a vaccine. The whole hearing should have been boycotted by everyone, including by lead author Andrew Wakefield.

But people showed up to support not only Wakefield, but Walker-Smith and lead turncoat author Simon Murch too. Walker-Smith and Murch were greeted with flowers and hugs.

Why? Walker-Smith and Murch may have been caring doctors at one time, but all the good they did was undone by their interpretation “retraction.”

Why is Age of Autism’s John Stone friends with John Walker-Smith on Facebook? Why did Stone use his platform to hock both Walker-Smith’s and lead turncoat author Simon Murch’s books? He has not responded to Autism Investigated’s criticism, nor has the Walker-Smith Facebook group.

The Wakefield turncoat doctors deserve no accolades, only scorn.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

4 Thoughts on “Autism People: Do Not Honor The Andrew Wakefield Turncoat Doctors

  1. Hans Scholl on August 29, 2018 at 11:31 am said:

    Stanley seems to be admitting something v significant here to me :
    “induces severe reactions in some infants”

    It looks like dear old Stanley is still having trouble with making the pertussis vaccine work :

    First published August 6, 2018 – More info

    The introduction of a whole-cell vaccine against Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough, dramatically reduced disease incidence. Unfortunately, the whole-cell formulation also induces severe reactions in some infants. Because of this, acellular vaccines have been developed, but they are used exclusively in high-income countries. However, the acellular vaccines do not provide long-term protection, and despite the use of routine boosters, the disease is on the rise. In this issue of the JCI, da Silva Antunes and colleagues demonstrate that the whole-cell vaccines promote long-term polarization toward Th1 and Th17 responses, while the acellular vaccines induce Th2 polarization. Moreover, this polarization is long term, as the response to acellular boosters is dependent on the initial vaccine given in infancy. The authors speculate that Tregs may be induced by initial acellular vaccine administration. The results of this study have important implications for the development of pertussis vaccination strategies that would induce Th1 and Th17 polarization.

  2. Hans Litten on August 29, 2018 at 1:17 pm said:

    4 Years After CDC Whistleblower Comes Forward: Nothing Happens

    It was four years ago, August 2014, that a senior CDC scientist—Dr. William Thompson–claimed whistleblower protection by claiming that the CDC had committed fraud by hiding and manipulating data that showed the MMR vaccine was associated with a higher risk of autism. In August, 2014, I wrote, “Now, there may be proof that the CDC not only knew about the link between the MMR vaccine and autism but they changed the data in a landmark 2004 study to hide the damning data. What did the heads of the CDC do when they were notified of this fraud? They altered the data and reported in 2004 (1) that there was no association between autism and the MMR vaccine. Who wrote this article? William Thompson, PhD, the very same whistleblower, was one of the authors of that 2004 study. Dr. Thompson claimed he was suffering with regret and remorse over the damage that has been done to our children over the last ten years.”

    According to the CDC, we are currently suffering through an exponential increase in autism since the 1970s. In 1970, the autism rate was 1 in 10,000. In 2018, the rate of autism epidemically increased to 1 in 59 children. That is a 169-fold increase in autism in U.S. children over nearly 50 years!

    You would think a senior CDC scientist who claims malfeasance at the CDC is responsible for the rapid rise in autism would immediately trigger Congressional investigations to find out the truth.

    However, our dysfunctional Congress would prove you wrong. Four years later, there have been no investigations by Congress. There has been no presidential vaccine safety commission studying the matter.

    Four years later, there has been nothing.
    I am sick of writing about this travesty.

    Folks, The United States of American simply cannot survive if 1 in 59 of our children is being diagnosed with autism.

    I know that the Powers-That-Be continually state that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

    If the Powers-That-Be are correct, then why are U.S. children so ill and why do so many suffer with autism? We have significantly more autism, chronic illnesses, cancer, asthma, and autoimmune disorders per capita when compared to any other western country.

    We are also the most vaccinated. Show me the data where more vaccines result in better overall health for our population. I can assure you that there is no data to show.

    What can we do? It is time to start calling the Office of Government Reform (OGR) and demanding that they investigate Dr. Thompson’s claim. Chaffetz, the former do-nothing OGR Chair failed to do his job, even when he told everyone to stop calling his office so that he could do something.

    To Dr. Thompson: Where are you? Do you still believe what you said four years ago? If you do, how are able to sleep at night knowing nothing has changed? If you don’t, what has changed?

    Trey Gowdy is the present Chair of OGR. It is time to let Mr. Gowdy and your own Congresspeople know how you feel. Call the OGR today and daily and tell them to investigate Dr. Thompson’s claims. Tell them Dr. Thompson needs to testify in front of Congress, under oath. The phone number for OGR is: 202.225.5074. Put the number in your speed dial and call every day and ask why the CDC whistleblower has not been called to testify.

    Don’t hesitate to let me know if you have anything noteworthy to share from the conversations that you have with your Congressperson or OGR.

    ~Dr B

  3. Hans Scholl on August 29, 2018 at 1:27 pm said:

    Priceless article (does injecting formaldehyde into infants concern anyone ?):

    California Bill Aims To Protect Salon Workers From Toxic Exposures
    Kurt Niland

    August 25, 2018

    California Bill Aims To Protect Salon Workers From Toxic Exposures
    A new bill aiming to better protect beauty salon workers from the chemical hazards they routinely face is making its way through the California legislature.

    While beauty salons don’t normally conjure images of occupational hazards like some other occupations do, say for instance construction work or long-haul truck driving, the truth is that hairdressers, manicurists, and other salon workers face some of the biggest workplace risks with their daily exposures to toxic chemicals.

    Formaldehyde, a highly volatile and toxic compound that poses a substantial threat to human health, is commonly found in and released by certain hair-smoothing products used by salons, such as Brazilian Blowout, a popular line of hair straighteners and smoothers.

    During application, these hair straighteners and other products emit toxic fumes, which can build up in the air and pose a significant health hazard to salon workers, most of whom are of child-bearing age, and their clients.

    Formaldehyde can irritate the eyes and nose; cause allergic reactions of the skin, eyes, and lungs; and is a significant cancer hazard. Salons that choose to use products that contain or release formaldehyde are required to abide by OSHA’s formaldehyde and hazard communication standards, but even with the regulations in place, many salon workers don’t fully understand the toxicity of certain products they routinely use.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires disclosure of ingredients for cosmetics and personal care products sold directly to consumers, but not for professional-use products. Typically, beauty salon workers and managers have no way of knowing what ingredients are in the products they use each day or if these ingredients could be harming their health.

    According to Environmental Working Group, Assembly Member Ash Kalra, D-San Jose, introduced the California bill, and it looks positioned to pass. The bill would require professional cosmetics products used in California salons to disclose their ingredients on the label. The proposed legislation passed the Assembly unanimously in May and was approved in a unanimous bipartisan vote by the Senate Appropriations Committee. It is now headed for a vote by the full Senate.

    “Despite the overwhelming evidence that these formaldehyde-based treatments are not safe for consumers or stylists, the FDA has yet to act to protect the public. With such a lack of government oversight and protection, manufacturers should be required to disclose the ingredients in their professional use products, so that salon workers and managers can make informed decisions,” Environmental Working Group said in its news release about the proposed bill.

  4. Pingback: PLANNED OBITUARY for Senior Turncoat John Walker-Smith

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation