LANCET: Anti-Semitism is Fine, Suing Vaccine Manufacturers is “Fatal”

Photo Credit: EAT Foundation

Read the editor’s rejected letter to the editor of The Lancet about the double-standard in his journal concerning vaccine injury and anti-Semitism:

Not even anti-Semitism is a fatal conflict of interest worthy of retraction, so why is vaccine injury litigation?

The Lancet keeps a published “An open letter for the people in Gaza” by Manduca et al. despite the undisclosed, anti-Semitic conflicts of interest of two coauthors. Yet The Lancet now keeps “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children” by Wakefield et al. retracted solely because of a coauthor’s undisclosed involvement in vaccine injury litigation.

The stated reasons for the paper’s retraction are findings by the General Medical Council (GMC) that were overturned on appeal by the senior author. The Lancet’s ombudsman made clear in email that reasons not explicitly mentioned in the retraction statement are the reasons for the paper’s continued retraction. Wakefield’s undisclosed “interests” of litigation are those reasons.

Meanwhile, The Lancet keeps the Gaza letter published even after it was revealed that two of its coauthors circulated anti-Semitic conspiracy theories by a former Ku Klux Klansman. One of those coauthors is still registered with the GMC despite her non-disclosure to the editor of The Lancet. That is because a “conflict of interest” as defined in GMC’s guidance for doctors is left to the subjective decision of the doctor.

The editor of The Lancet – being registered with a license to practice – would know that. Yet he is perfectly happy to be cited in the GMC’s discredited decision against Wakefield et al. as the person whom Wakefield was obligated to disclose his litigation involvement to. The editor even assisted the GMC in its pursuit of Wakefield after accusing him of a “fatal conflict of interest.”

Per GMC’s guidance, Wakefield was under no obligation of disclosure. The GMC decisions cited in The Lancet retraction explicitly held him to a different standard because of what he published.

Neither the GMC nor the editor took any such exception with the anti-Semitism of Gaza letter coauthors. The editor called it “irrelevant,” saying “I have no plans to retract the letter, and I would not retract the letter even if it was found to be substantiated.”

Since anti-Semitism is not even worthy of retraction or disciplinary erasure, vaccine injury litigation should not be either. If the editor of The Lancet agreed, he would have restored Wakefield et al. with a statement urging the GMC to restore Andrew Wakefield’s registration. The editor refused.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

6 Thoughts on “LANCET: Anti-Semitism is Fine, Suing Vaccine Manufacturers is “Fatal”

  1. Pingback: LANCET: Anti-Semitism is Fine, Suing Vaccine Manufacturers is “Fatal” - NAMELY LIBERTY

  2. Will on May 23, 2018 at 8:39 pm said:

    What does an April fools joke about Gaza have to do with investigating autism. Yes I hate the corruption of the vaccine industry but not every statement in “support” of the Palestinians is anti-semitic. Is the author of this blog a hyper Zionist who believes every single thing his cult like pastor tells him is true. Remember GMO, air pollution, and dozens of other environmental factors contribute to autism.

    • You should probably read my letter before dropping straw man arguments. What’s a “hyper Zionist” anyway, and since when were pastors involved?

      “Remember GMO, air pollution, and dozens of other environmental factors contribute to autism.”

      But only vaccines caused the autism epidemic.

  3. Pingback: Dead Merck Vaccine Chief Wanted You to Appreciate Brain Injury - Autism Investigated

  4. Pingback: California Punishes Dr. Sears for Saving Child from Toxic Vaccinations - Autism Investigated

  5. Pingback: FDA Chief: Expert Witnesses of Vaccine Injury Shouldn't Publish Papers - Autism Investigated

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation