Vaccine Adverse Event Under-Reporting System “Proves” Vaccine is Safe

Pediatrics – the official journal of the dumbest of the world’s dumbest profession – is at it again. They are now claiming the DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular Pertussis) vaccine is safe. Their source: the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), co-managed by FDA and CDC. The problem with VAERS is that it is an entirely passive reporting system. That means only a tiny fraction of events are even reported, since it’s done voluntarily.

Ironically, Pediatrics has dismissed research analyzing VAERS to show vaccines are dangerous. Yet here the journal is now using VAERS to say a vaccine is safe, oh the irony! The editor-in-chief of Pediatrics actually blogged about this study in a post titled, “A Safe Look at 16 Years of National Reports on DTaP Vaccine Adverse Events.”

Even worse, the investigators are all with FDA and CDC. Those are the federal agencies that run VAERS and should know better than anyone how the database should and should not be used. If VAERS were truly an adequate system, there would be no need for the Vaccine Safety Datalink. That is the much more complete surveillance system comprised of millions of HMO records that is both maintained and restricted by CDC. But with all the hypocrisy of the vaccine state, using VAERS to prove vaccines are safe is nowhere near a new low for them.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

10 Thoughts on “Vaccine Adverse Event Under-Reporting System “Proves” Vaccine is Safe

  1. Paolo on June 20, 2018 at 5:11 am said:

    Thank you for the heads up.
    What about the long list of studies that is usually being used to prove vaccines are safe and do not cause autism (e.g. MMR). Are they based on VAERS or more accurate investigations. Thanks

    • Of course! They don’t use VAERS, and ironically they actually show associations that of course get discarded instead of reported. Here is a summary Autism Investigated has on MMR. Here is Autism Investigated’s post on CDC’s study of thimerosal. And doctors in Italy helped show that a 2017 study in JAMA implicated influenza vaccines to pregnant mothers causing autism. At the beginning of this post are hyperlinks to studies showing vaccines kill kids. Thank you for commenting!

  2. Hans Litten on June 20, 2018 at 7:49 am said:

    Hopefully it happens and this is the straw that breaks Gerberdings back.

    How long is a drugmaker willing to wait on an indication expansion plan? For Merck’s HPV vaccines, that’s 10 years.

    Merck won the FDA “priority review” designation for an application to expand Gardasil 9 into older populations, about 10 years after the agency struck down a similar attempt for the company’s older version Gardasil. The FDA is expected to deliver a verdict by Oct. 6, 2018.

    Gardasil 9 is currently FDA-approved for people 9 through 26 years of age, but Merck is seeking FDA approval to extend its use in women and men ages 27 to 45 for the prevention of certain cancers and diseases caused by the nine HPV strains covered by the vaccine. That’s the exact age group Merck was once eyeing for the quadrivalent shot Gardasil.

    Back in 2008, after agreeing to a faster review in the age group, the FDA decided against Merck’s case for an additional Gardasil approval in females 27 to 45. The agency in 2009 issued a second complete response letter for that application, demanding Merck to provide longer-term efficacy data in the age group.

    That set of data apparently didn’t turn things around for Merck. In both Gardasil’s and Gardasil 9’s current labels, information about a study on 3,253 women 27 through 45 years of age states that there was “no statistically significant efficacy” demonstrated by the vaccine in preventing high-grade cervical lesions or cervical cancer.

    What has changed in the past decade that Merck hopes could convince FDA for a positive decision this time?

    Observational and clinical data over the past decade demonstrate that women 27 to 45 are also at risk of acquiring new HPV infections, Merck spokeswoman Pamela Eisele told FiercePharma. Even though many people have already been exposed to HPV at an younger age, they have not been exposed to all nine HPV types targeted by Gardasil 9. Besides, a follow-up of the long-term study with Gardasil in women ages 27-45 showed no additional cases of HPV disease for at least 10 years following vaccination, a result that can be extended to Gardasil 9, she said.

    RELATED: Merck’s Gardasil 9 offers at least 6 years of cancer protection, data show (wow not 60 ?)

    The Gardasil family has in recent years been steadily building up its case at fighting off HPV-related diseases, including cervical, vulvar, vaginal and anal cancers and genital warts. Result released last October from a large-scale phase 3 study in girls and women 16 to 26 years of age showed that protection offered by Gardasil 9 lasts six years. Another one showed the older Gardasil’s protection can last a decade.

    An analysis of data from Public Health England this week showed that since the introduction of a HPV vaccination program in 2008, first with GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent Cervarix, HPV infection incidence in women 16 to 21 has dropped 86%, according to the Independent. Gardasil replaced Cervarix in the U.K.’s program in September 2012.

    Because of those positive data and higher rates of uptake and course completion, life science commercial intelligence firm Evaluate recently predicted the vaccine’s sales will grow from $2.38 billion in 2017 to $3.28 billion in 2024.

  3. Hans Litten on June 20, 2018 at 8:12 am said:

    This is how they fake the science :

    This is slightly horrifying. Each editor of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology received, on average $475 072 personally and another $119 407 for ‘research’. With 35 editors, that’s about $15 million in bribes to doctors. No wonder the JACC loves drugs and devices. It pays the private school bills. Mo money = we’ll publish your crooked studies for you. Mo money, baby, mo money.

  4. Hans Litten on June 20, 2018 at 9:21 am said:

    c60 & Telomere shortening

    C60 (Carbon 60) is the newest health sensation in the natural health and longevity worlds. So what is C60? It is simply a special geometrical arrangement of 60 carbon atoms into a single molecule that looks like a soccer ball, made up of inter-locking pentagonal and hexagonal structures. C60 molecules are also called fullerenes or buckyballs after Buckminster Fuller, the man who discovered them. By the way, Fuller was the very same guy who said that the best way to overcome a (failing, tyrannical or destructive) system is to create a new one that makes the old one obsolete. Understanding this is the key to defeating the New World Order (NWO) worldwide conspiracy.

  5. Hans Litten on June 20, 2018 at 5:12 pm said:

    I think regarding the on going fight against Fake News,

    1. they should make it illegal to read any vaccine inserts
    2. they should make it illegal to investigate vaccine ingredients (Engley & themiserol)
    3. they should raid the laboratory of experts in nanospectroscopy and seize all their work (Gatti)
    4. they should ban any film exposing any vaccine misdeeds at the cdc (Thompson-Vaxxed)
    5. they should make it illegal to mention the term sv40, Xmrv
    6. they should suspend any FDA report about to link formaldehyde with leukemia
    7. they should make it illegal to learn any knowledge about vaccination
    8. they should make Edward Jenner the patron saint of the human race & canonise all doctors
    9. they should offer the top job at the WHO to Colon Boyle
    10. they should have Julie Gerberding reading the 9 o’clock news every evening
    11. they should ostracise\persecute all scientists who finds anything incriminating (mikovits -exley)
    12. they should pay legions of ex military people to flood the net to fight the flood of truth
    13. they should make it law that people have to sacrifice their own children on the altar of vaccine lies

    Lets face it, its all about the fake vaccines (nothing else)
    And they have done all this and much more !

  6. Hans Litten on June 21, 2018 at 10:31 am said:

    A true Activist – Well done Ginger Taylor

    The LAT and its history of irresponsible science journalism

    Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:35:11 -0400

    Ginger Taylor

    Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, Executive Chairman, LA Times , Norman Pearlstine, Executive Editor, LA Times , Nicholas Goldberg, Editor of the Editorial Pages, LA Times , Karen Kaplan, Science and Medicine Editor, LA Times

    Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong and The Management of the LA Times,

    Today I read about the change in ownership of the LA Times, and Dr. Soon-Shiong’s commitment to leaving behind the era of fake news so that the paper may become a “bastion of editorial integrity and independence.” I am writing to offer you a starting point for where that change may begin. I encourage you to humbly examine the paper’s previous lack of integrity in science journalism, so that it may be repented of, to lead to a new course of honest reporting.

    My faith in mainstream media “science journalism” ended in 2009 because of the LA Times, the abysmal and juvenile reporting they were publishing on very serious vaccine safety issues, and the appalling exchange I had with their science writers and editors on their “fake news.” It resulted in a, widely circulated, in-depth piece on the bad faith of the paper, and in science reporting in general. At the time I cautioned that the course the paper was on would only lead to the complete loss of public trust on these matters, and we have seen that come to fruition in this era.

    It is my understanding that Dr. Soon-Shiong is in the vaccine industry himself, and unfortunately we have seen how that kind of conflict of interest in media ownership results in bias, so I am dubious that the LAT will make the changes needed to conduct earnest, objective reporting on these issues. However, if the California News Group is serious about developing integrity and demonstrating that they are independent from industry influence, then this is the place to start:

    Chris Mooney, Sheril Kirshenbaum, Lori Kozlowski, Rosie Mestel, Thomas Maugh, David Gorski, Virginia Hughes, Science Journalists, The Dying of the LA Times and an Angry Autism Mom

    Ginger Taylor
    Adventures In Autism

  7. Hans Litten on June 21, 2018 at 10:35 am said:

    I have seen graphs previously suggesting the BCG vaccine leads to higher incidence of diabetes so this is an interesting article claiming they can cure diabetes with the BCG vaccine.

    Perhaps they can cure my kids autism with more MMR doses ? Total bs.

    BCG vaccine leads to long-term blood sugar improvement in type 1 diabetes patients

    Long-term follow-up of participants in clinical trials of a generic vaccine to reverse advanced type 1 diabetes finds significant clinical benefits, including restoration of near-normal blood sugar levels. Three years after receiving two administrations of the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine four weeks apart, all members of a group of adults with longstanding type 1 diabetes showed an improvement in HbA1c to near normal levels—improvement that persisted for the following five years. The study from a Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) research team—published in npj Vaccines – also reports that the effects of BCG vaccine on blood sugar control appear to depend on a totally novel metabolic mechanism that increases cellular consumption of glucose.

  8. Hans Litten on June 21, 2018 at 11:27 am said:

    Genetically modifying the Pigs now. There are no unknowns here. No experimentation at all.
    Trust me my name is Christine, I am infallible, I am god-like.

    What does Seralini think of all this ? I wonder ?

    Researchers at the University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute used gene editing to delete a small region of pig DNA. But this relatively small edit prevents the PRRS virus from gaining a foothold on the surfaces of pig cells.

    The scientists then exposed four of their gene-edited pigs to the PRRS virus. Writing in the Journal of Virology, they report that none became ill.

    Research leader Dr Christine Tait-Burkard stressed that no foreign genes were inserted into the pig. She added that tests so far showed that the animals are not weakened or affected in any other way by the process.

    “The animals are all pig… with just a tiny section snipped out. The main thing that this edit will do is… benefit animal welfare because the animals will not get a very devastating disease,” she said.

    The genetic edit is permanent, so disease resistance will be passed down the generations through natural breeding.
    What is next Dr Christine Tait-Burkard ?
    Genetically modify human beings to remove the gene that leads us to question your flawed science? Make us all automatons like they always the dreamt ?

  9. Hans Litten on June 21, 2018 at 2:58 pm said:

    The WHO has taken to put up reassuring videos on YouTube now (total desperation by criminals who are losing control of the situation – the end is close now – I can smell it now – I can taste it .)

    The WHO says Gardasil is fine – you might get a little headache .

    3 minutes of pure filthy lies :

    “This video uses infographics to explain how authorities are keeping a close eye on the safety of the HPV vaccine. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation